<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The .TEL domain scam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/11/10/the-tel-domain-scam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/11/10/the-tel-domain-scam/</link>
	<description>Fixed price, low cost web design and hosting based in Harrogate, North Yorkshire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:01:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/11/10/the-tel-domain-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=434#comment-958</guid>
		<description>@Rarst: You are right, it is all within the rules. I guess it is a case of &quot;Don&#039;t hate the player, hate the game&quot;. I am not a fan of sponsored TLD&#039;s full stop and I guess that is the crux of it :)

I guess only time will .tel (see what I did there? LOL), but my prediction is this domain will be a damp squib and ultimately will enjoy limited uptake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rarst: You are right, it is all within the rules. I guess it is a case of &#8220;Don&#8217;t hate the player, hate the game&#8221;. I am not a fan of sponsored TLD&#8217;s full stop and I guess that is the crux of it <img src='http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I guess only time will .tel (see what I did there? LOL), but my prediction is this domain will be a damp squib and ultimately will enjoy limited uptake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/11/10/the-tel-domain-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=434#comment-957</guid>
		<description>@Jim

Well, I don&#039;t see anything wrong on IANA/ICANN part. Company pays for this domain (which is fine under concept of sponsored TLD) to be used for specific community use (hosting contact information of clients).

Who knows how many strings were pulled behind the scenes, but in the end it is all within the rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim</p>
<p>Well, I don&#8217;t see anything wrong on IANA/ICANN part. Company pays for this domain (which is fine under concept of sponsored TLD) to be used for specific community use (hosting contact information of clients).</p>
<p>Who knows how many strings were pulled behind the scenes, but in the end it is all within the rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/11/10/the-tel-domain-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=434#comment-956</guid>
		<description>Hi Rarst,

Yes, I agree, it was probably a poor choice of words to call it a &quot;scam&quot;. However, it is IMHO not good that ICANN can give this domain to a company who dictates people cannot host elsewhere and cannot control their domain.

Yes, it is not &quot;hidden&quot; as such, but equally it is not really fair. In the UK if the domain had been given to British Telecom there would likely be criticism that it is anti competitive. So I guess the correct term is scandal (albeit small in the great scheme of things) rather than scam.

You&#039;re right about the marketing though, a good percentage of marketing is equally dodgy :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rarst,</p>
<p>Yes, I agree, it was probably a poor choice of words to call it a &#8220;scam&#8221;. However, it is IMHO not good that ICANN can give this domain to a company who dictates people cannot host elsewhere and cannot control their domain.</p>
<p>Yes, it is not &#8220;hidden&#8221; as such, but equally it is not really fair. In the UK if the domain had been given to British Telecom there would likely be criticism that it is anti competitive. So I guess the correct term is scandal (albeit small in the great scheme of things) rather than scam.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about the marketing though, a good percentage of marketing is equally dodgy <img src='http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/11/10/the-tel-domain-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=434#comment-955</guid>
		<description>What is scam exactly? They are &quot;selling&quot; top level domains (nothing new, Tokelau did that with .tk many years before custom TLD became available) which they still control (also nothing new, plenty of &quot;on behalf&quot; horror stories, also in many years).

There is some technical bs, but I think it&#039;s probably because of ignorance rather than malice.

Yes, their product sucks and is aimed at idiots. But I don&#039;t think this is definition of scam.

Some top brands get away with much bigger lies than this and people merely call it marketing. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is scam exactly? They are &#8220;selling&#8221; top level domains (nothing new, Tokelau did that with .tk many years before custom TLD became available) which they still control (also nothing new, plenty of &#8220;on behalf&#8221; horror stories, also in many years).</p>
<p>There is some technical bs, but I think it&#8217;s probably because of ignorance rather than malice.</p>
<p>Yes, their product sucks and is aimed at idiots. But I don&#8217;t think this is definition of scam.</p>
<p>Some top brands get away with much bigger lies than this and people merely call it marketing. <img src='http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
