<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Adsense and the privacy policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/05/20/google-adsense-and-the-privacy-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/05/20/google-adsense-and-the-privacy-policy/</link>
	<description>Fixed price, low cost web design and hosting based in Harrogate, North Yorkshire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 03:24:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/05/20/google-adsense-and-the-privacy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=394#comment-698</guid>
		<description>&quot;Duplicate penalty&quot; is overhyped. It takes some real copying effort to get hit by it, one page is nothing. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Duplicate penalty&#8221; is overhyped. It takes some real copying effort to get hit by it, one page is nothing. <img src='http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/05/20/google-adsense-and-the-privacy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=394#comment-697</guid>
		<description>If you do block it with robots.txt, I think you&#039;d be pretty easily able to point out to Google that you do have a privacy policy without much trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you do block it with robots.txt, I think you&#8217;d be pretty easily able to point out to Google that you do have a privacy policy without much trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/05/20/google-adsense-and-the-privacy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=394#comment-694</guid>
		<description>I have done a bit of research and it seems this question has been raised before. Some people block the bots with robots.txt, some people don&#039;t.

My feeling is just to leave it and hope Google is clever enough to tell this is a privacy policy and won&#039;t freak out over the duplicate content. 

I think I may develop my own though, and because my sites will share an IP Google will know the sites are related and won&#039;t penalise them (I hope).

I do think  maybe I am over-analysing it a bit, but this seems to be another area covered by &quot;Google-voodoo&quot;. I wish they would be a bit more clear about how we can do things by the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have done a bit of research and it seems this question has been raised before. Some people block the bots with robots.txt, some people don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>My feeling is just to leave it and hope Google is clever enough to tell this is a privacy policy and won&#8217;t freak out over the duplicate content. </p>
<p>I think I may develop my own though, and because my sites will share an IP Google will know the sites are related and won&#8217;t penalise them (I hope).</p>
<p>I do think  maybe I am over-analysing it a bit, but this seems to be another area covered by &#8220;Google-voodoo&#8221;. I wish they would be a bit more clear about how we can do things by the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barnawi</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/05/20/google-adsense-and-the-privacy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>barnawi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=394#comment-693</guid>
		<description>very useful information. thank u a lot..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very useful information. thank u a lot..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyndi</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/05/20/google-adsense-and-the-privacy-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyndi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=394#comment-692</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting question. You have got me thinking here and maybe I must change my copy of a generic policy slightly and then it cannot be duplicate content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting question. You have got me thinking here and maybe I must change my copy of a generic policy slightly and then it cannot be duplicate content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
