<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshop vs Fireworks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/02/18/photoshop-vs-fireworks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/02/18/photoshop-vs-fireworks/</link>
	<description>Fixed price, low cost web design and hosting based in Harrogate, North Yorkshire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 03:24:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: diseño web</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/02/18/photoshop-vs-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator>diseño web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=356#comment-1380</guid>
		<description>Everything depends on the type of work that we are going to carry out. If it is a project Web because I advise to use fireworks by its multiple tools and the close relation with dreamweaver. But, if it is a project for impression would be due to use photoshop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything depends on the type of work that we are going to carry out. If it is a project Web because I advise to use fireworks by its multiple tools and the close relation with dreamweaver. But, if it is a project for impression would be due to use photoshop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/02/18/photoshop-vs-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=356#comment-675</guid>
		<description>@Jason: Thanks for the reply. I feel your pain regarding Photoshop. I have time and time again tried to use Photoshop for web design and each time I have gone straight back to Fireworks. If you like Flash then I think you will like Fireworks.... please let me know how you get on!

I think Photoshop is amazing at photo manipulation, but seriously lacking in terms of web development. It&#039;s a shame thet Macromedia and Adobe ended up the same company, as I would have loved to see Fireworks move forward. I feel it&#039;s development is slowing down a little, just as all the Adobe products have over the years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jason: Thanks for the reply. I feel your pain regarding Photoshop. I have time and time again tried to use Photoshop for web design and each time I have gone straight back to Fireworks. If you like Flash then I think you will like Fireworks&#8230;. please let me know how you get on!</p>
<p>I think Photoshop is amazing at photo manipulation, but seriously lacking in terms of web development. It&#8217;s a shame thet Macromedia and Adobe ended up the same company, as I would have loved to see Fireworks move forward. I feel it&#8217;s development is slowing down a little, just as all the Adobe products have over the years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/02/18/photoshop-vs-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=356#comment-674</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to add my thoughts from a complete beginners perspective. I am ok wth DW, and flash, but photoshop just seems like its all in a different language. I obviously need to edit / create images to improve my designs using the above but like you say I just end up swearing at the screen and walking away. It sees to turn something I see as a hobby which i would like to get better at  into a real chore. If you follow a tute to do some tacky 3d dice or something it seems to work but to just explore and i guess design with it seems impossible. Obviously Im new, inexperienced etc but I have seen seen some fantastic work done with PShop so Iam missing the point, but with flash &amp; DW I feel I learn every time with pshop I feel stupid! just downloading fireworks now, watch this space!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to add my thoughts from a complete beginners perspective. I am ok wth DW, and flash, but photoshop just seems like its all in a different language. I obviously need to edit / create images to improve my designs using the above but like you say I just end up swearing at the screen and walking away. It sees to turn something I see as a hobby which i would like to get better at  into a real chore. If you follow a tute to do some tacky 3d dice or something it seems to work but to just explore and i guess design with it seems impossible. Obviously Im new, inexperienced etc but I have seen seen some fantastic work done with PShop so Iam missing the point, but with flash &amp; DW I feel I learn every time with pshop I feel stupid! just downloading fireworks now, watch this space!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/02/18/photoshop-vs-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=356#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Good points there Margaret, and thanks for the comments. I have not used Corel draw for a good 15 years, so I am sure it has changed since I did. As for PSP being in a different price bracket, that is true and if I didn&#039;t already have the discussed products it would be a strong contender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points there Margaret, and thanks for the comments. I have not used Corel draw for a good 15 years, so I am sure it has changed since I did. As for PSP being in a different price bracket, that is true and if I didn&#8217;t already have the discussed products it would be a strong contender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/02/18/photoshop-vs-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=356#comment-582</guid>
		<description>You might want to check out Corel&#039;s Paintshop Pro. I&#039;ve been using this product for many years now and find that it incorporates the best of both worlds. You can drag objects around as you describe in FW, it doesn&#039;t have any issues with fonts or font caching and by using a font organizer program, I have access to the over 2500 fonts stored on my computer(!) 

I&#039;ve never used Fireworks, so really have no basis for comparison other than the items you&#039;ve mentioned here. I *do* have Photoshop CS and find it&#039;s not very user-friendly although I&#039;m sure it does many things better than PSP. 

Another consideration is that while PSP isn&#039;t free, it is under $100 -- something you cannot say about either Fireworks OR Photoshop!

Margaret</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to check out Corel&#8217;s Paintshop Pro. I&#8217;ve been using this product for many years now and find that it incorporates the best of both worlds. You can drag objects around as you describe in FW, it doesn&#8217;t have any issues with fonts or font caching and by using a font organizer program, I have access to the over 2500 fonts stored on my computer(!) </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never used Fireworks, so really have no basis for comparison other than the items you&#8217;ve mentioned here. I *do* have Photoshop CS and find it&#8217;s not very user-friendly although I&#8217;m sure it does many things better than PSP. </p>
<p>Another consideration is that while PSP isn&#8217;t free, it is under $100 &#8212; something you cannot say about either Fireworks OR Photoshop!</p>
<p>Margaret</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/02/18/photoshop-vs-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=356#comment-537</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t mind using fireworks again, however to sell designs on the net, every one uses .psd - so kind of can&#039;t unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind using fireworks again, however to sell designs on the net, every one uses .psd &#8211; so kind of can&#8217;t unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/02/18/photoshop-vs-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=356#comment-531</guid>
		<description>@Rarst: You&#039;re not kidding PS is expensive. I have boxed copies of both of these products as I use them for business, but I certainly would not fork out for Photoshop if it was just a hobby!

A lot of people are using vector packages for web design now, especially for logo&#039;s etc. It&#039;s something I struggled to get into but makes sense if you think you may wish to scale your work at some point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rarst: You&#8217;re not kidding PS is expensive. I have boxed copies of both of these products as I use them for business, but I certainly would not fork out for Photoshop if it was just a hobby!</p>
<p>A lot of people are using vector packages for web design now, especially for logo&#8217;s etc. It&#8217;s something I struggled to get into but makes sense if you think you may wish to scale your work at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/02/18/photoshop-vs-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=356#comment-530</guid>
		<description>I am really bad with drawing stuff and using Paint.NET :) Photoshop is too complicated for me and very expensive (yeah, I know that most of users pirate it anyway).

Lately I was thinking that since I am way better with command-coordinate approach to images (some CAD experience) I should look into vector image editors. Thinking about trying Inkscape or something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really bad with drawing stuff and using Paint.NET <img src='http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Photoshop is too complicated for me and very expensive (yeah, I know that most of users pirate it anyway).</p>
<p>Lately I was thinking that since I am way better with command-coordinate approach to images (some CAD experience) I should look into vector image editors. Thinking about trying Inkscape or something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/02/18/photoshop-vs-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=356#comment-529</guid>
		<description>@Paul: It will be interesting to hear what you think of Fireworks. Interestingly my font issues were resolved this evening by deleting my font caches. It&#039;s a great product, but for some reason I still want to design in Photoshop LOL.

Let us know how you get on if you do try Fireworks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul: It will be interesting to hear what you think of Fireworks. Interestingly my font issues were resolved this evening by deleting my font caches. It&#8217;s a great product, but for some reason I still want to design in Photoshop LOL.</p>
<p>Let us know how you get on if you do try Fireworks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/2009/02/18/photoshop-vs-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksynergy.co.uk/?p=356#comment-527</guid>
		<description>I mainly use Photoshop simply because I&#039;m familiar with it. It&#039;s obviously rather powerful. To be honest, I haven&#039;t given Fireworks a legitimate chance yet, but I probably should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mainly use Photoshop simply because I&#8217;m familiar with it. It&#8217;s obviously rather powerful. To be honest, I haven&#8217;t given Fireworks a legitimate chance yet, but I probably should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
